I would like to apologize for recently reposting a story from a Wallingford Facebook page regarding an incident between an African-American teenager and an employee of a local business. According to the story as posted by the young man’s mother, the employee had used a racial slur, which led to altercation and the police being called.
When I originally posted the story, I reposted the account provided by young man’s mother along with a note pleading with people NOT to take their anger out on the company the man worked for, since they had not been given a chance to respond (at the time I as reposting, the firm had already received a slew of negative reviews on Yelp related to the incident.)
What I did not do, and should have done was:
- Contact the woman who had posted the account for permission and consent to repost her story
- Contact the company the man worked for to get their comment
- Contact the man involved in the story for his side of the story
- Seek to contact the other people that allegedly saw the incident
- Make clear that the story was, at the time of publishing, uncorroborated
This was negligent and irresponsible of me, and I am ashamed of it. I am also ashamed of how long it has taken me to post this apology. Honestly, I let my shame delay facing the responsibility of posting this apology. I am sorry.
When the original Facebook post was removed, and it became clear that no corroborating evidence to the young man’s story would emerge, I removed the original post and put a brief summary of what happened in its place. You can read that here. My fellow editor, Katy, followed up by posting an update on the situation that was provided by the company, Artisan Electric, that the man in question works for. Again, I should have corrected my error earlier, and I thank Katy for taking the initiative.
In summary of the summary: the police and Artisan Electric have concluded that “there is no evidence our employee used offensive language or physically assaulted anyone.” The young man’s family has declined a meeting with Artisan Electric, for which one can imagine any number of reasons (and I imagine we will all bring our preconceptions to our imaginings). While this is different than concluding that the young man manufactured or creatively altered the story, if we are to respect “innocent until proven guilty”, then this is absolutely a confirmation of the man’s innocence.
Again, I want to apologize to all involved for elevating this issue without prior investigation. This is a blog, not a newspaper. Neither I, nor my fellow editors or writers, are paid for what we do here (virtually everything collected from sponsorship left over after expenses has gone to FamilyWorks since the relaunch.) Nonetheless, I should have recognized that if I’m going to wield the megaphone, I have a responsibility to do it responsibly and basic journalistic standards need to be applied when dealing with issues of gravity.
Apology accepted here, Jordan, but did you see all the bajillions of stories, posts, tweets, etc. about this altercation? Your version seemed to try and supply all information available at the time. I’m under the impression what really happened still isn’t carved in stone. Rashomon, anyone? I’m still stymied by the whole thing. I’m sorry for the kid if what he says really happened and I’m sorry for the electrician if what he said really happened. No one comes out looking good in this situation. But, keep in mind, you likely wouldn’t have been able to get any comments from anyone first-person since this could turn into a legal problem. And I don’t Facebook, but wasn’t this lady’s Facebook post the sort that anyone could access? Whatever, it was all an ugly mess. I still look to Wallyhood to let me know what’s happening in the ‘hood, good and bad, so thanks for that!
Jordan, welcome to the world of frail human beings. Mistakes can be made…by all of us. Wallyhood is the best. You are the best. Thank you for your message.
Jordan, it is obvious that you are not a professional reporter or editor. If you were, this would be buried at the bottom of D12, under the obits…
Don’t be so hard on yourself; I figure that most of us understand that first reports are shaky at best. As time goes on, data and detail fill in and we get a better idea of the situation. Caveats and follow-ups are all I expect.
It takes character to admit a mistake and you have character, Jordan. What offended me was titling your piece, “Trumpland”. Why? To incite the ugly comments that followed? I learned more about some of the people who subscribe to this blog than I cared to learn. Many were quick to blame the worker because it was assumed he was Caucasian, I guess. I’m having a hard time with the hate that was exposed but I’m glad you opened my eyes. You’re a decent human being, Jordan, and I respect you for posting your well thought out, well written and heartfelt apology. Keep posting!
newbie, this is my real objection to the article. We are now seeing dozens of reported “incidents” of Trump supporters who harass or attack Muslims/gays/blacks, whatever special group, that the KKK and white militias are patrolling campuses, on and on, that are utter LIES! Saying that “Trumpland” has come to Wallingford just perpetuates the lie, even though nobody even mentioned Trump in this instance. Hate, though, trumps facts in today’s left.
Considering runyararo never swooped in to call you a racist, I’d say you got off easy.
Thanks for the update, Jordan. We all have preconceptions or biases and often jump to conclusions based on them. Social media only exacerbates this, which is why we have to ponder stories a bit longer than we did when we had professional journalists and editors in charge of chasing down and verifying the facts. And now we have “fake news” that some social media and advertising companies don’t want to get involved with since they consider everything is fair game and not their responsibility anyway. Democracy will not last where truth is considered irrelevant or too expensive to pursue.
I had followed the story from the beginning. From the get go, the author seemed all too eager to jump on this far-fetched story and crucify the man in the name of social justice. Little did he know, the story was completely fabricated by a teenager out to cause trouble in the neighborhood who tried to cover up his actions. The posting on this site, along with the teen’s mom’s FB posting, had created a firestorm of criticism of the man and the company he works for. There were talks of boycotting of the company, false Yelp reviews, calls for the firing of the man, actual suspension from work and loss of wages. As the result, Seattle Times also ran a story on this. I don’t think a simple sorry could never repair the damage done to the man and the company he works for.
I truly hope there is more than just an apology to end this debacle. The teen and his mom should also be held responsible for falsifying a police testimony. Along with the author, Jordan, there should be consequences for posting a fabricated and slandering story and starting a media reaction that caused harm and stress for all involved, not to mention loss of business and wages for the man.
I hope the man wrongly accused, and the company he works for, sues you for everything you are worth in civil court. They have a very strong case.
Good job creating more divide along racial lines in the Seattle Area.
You probably didn’t read my original post, but what it said was essentially “this is what someone on Facebook said” (which is accurate, and I sourced it, leaving it to the reader to decide whether it was true or no, I made no assertion that it was.) I still admit that even that was wrong, but it’s not going to fit any model of slander. As for the company he works for, again, I specifically said that the company should be given a chance to respond, and I followed up by quoting their response, which I believe was an excellent one.
Perhaps it will be a question for the lawyers to decide, and I’m not one, but I doubt it.
I read your original post word for word. The sentiment for apology is nice, but it does seem to attempt to shirk responsibility for causing real damage.
There is definitely the potential for a very strong civil suit for sure, but perhaps the company will try to take the high road. Depends on how bad the backlash against them continues I bet. Hard to take the high road when people’s livelihoods have been threatened/destroyed by irresponsible reporting. The “but I’m just a blogger” defense against torts is ineffective IMO
Still not sure why you think I wronged the company. My post said explicitly that even if the story were true, the company ought not be blamed for the actions of the employee (unless they failed to react to it, which they did not.)
As far as I can tell, the backlash against the company ended when they posted their response, which we ran on our front-page. Where are you seeing otherwise?
Of course you don’t think you caused any damage, because you’d be liable to them.
What about the suspended employee’s wages? Right before Christmas? Even though he was defending a mobility impaired elderly citizen?
He was suspended before my article appeared. I keep saying this, but those who don’t want to hear it, won’t. My article did not lead to his suspension or loss of wages, unless it could somehow go back in time.
Fake News. C’mon, say it!
Fake news is created intentionally. This was poor reporting.
You reported the facts that you had at the time. I for one didn’t read anything more into it than it being reports from eyewitnesses. It seems you think you could do a better job; maybe that’s so, but let’s learn from it and move on.
I don’t think that’s very nice, to be honest.
And sometimes it’s just deplorable.
Maybe INF is no longer welcome in the neighborhood, too?
He lives in Duvall.
And his comments are deleted. I guess he wasn’t welcome.
Discussion of the issues, even when I disagree, or puts me a bad light, is always fair game here. Flat-out name-calling is not. That’s what he was booted for.
We’d suffer little by his absence.
Okay, after reading the comments here, I am seeing one advantage of Nextdoor over Wallyhood: on Nextdoor we are identified by our names and we have to prove we live in the ‘hood so it generally leads to a bit more civil discourse than the people hiding behind screen names attempting to vilify Jordan here. So, INFTeamleader and Roy, will you track down everyone on Facebook and at the Seattle Times and every other blog, news source and public forum that you don’t think reported the incident to your liking and scold them, too?
“Villify”?
Targetting a good samaritan by amplifying and spreading libelous claims of racism is EVIL. Good thing I’m a racial minority myself, and am immune to this kind of insanity. See you at Molly Moon’s Lisa!
very thoughtful apology. I was struck by the intensity and what seemed to be ‘truth’ from the mothers original post and the video and her words about how her son always felt a welcome part of the school and friends.. was very convincing. My first rection was why did the police not report the alleged actions and words? I do not think we will ever know what happened.. but there will likely be court time for the boy dealing with window issue, Note- I see one member was removed for his? words. I considered reporting those words.. but given that a few others often or sometimes insult others here and remain I felt a lack of energy to report.
Something tells me you’re not really that sorry for any potential harm you may have caused the innocently accused. Something also tells me you’re not going out of your way to reach out with that person to let him know you’re sorry.
It stinks that you can’t trust anything. I know. I’m late to the party on this internet is full of lies thing, but it truly sucks. Reminds me of the post about the two women business partners of a cake store. It seemed pretty straight forward but then it wasn’t. Jordan had to issue a retraction for that one too. For god’s sake people, stop lying.
Thank you for owning up to this. But there is an elephant in the room that is never addressed: I see abusive behavior for blacks on a very frequent basis. This includes openly threatening people for looking at them the wrong way, homophobic, misogynistic, anti-Jewish, anti-white and anti-Asian comments. It my 35 years in Seattle I have witnessed more abusive behavior, including bigoted speech, from blacks then all other groups combined. It is taboo to object or express anger about this. It is taboo to talk about it unless one makes lame excuses for it. But the moment there is an accusation of racism against blacks there in an uproar sky high. Even if these incidents did happen as the accuser stated it is no different that unpleasant incidents that happen with the racial dynamics being the other way all the time. I have witnessed 4-5 dozen of incidents involving unprovoked abuse and hate speech involving blacks and one time were they not the perpetrator. To say there is a huge discrepancy between the coverage and consequences for abusive behavior towards blacks vs. abusive behavior by blacks is a huge understatement. This needs to change.
Life is about learning. You made an honest mistake mostly with the inflammatory title. You are a journalist, like it or not. Your title was a bit sensationalist, but it is very soon after the election and we are all still reeling.
I understand, unlike some others, how you could end up making that mistake. I might’ve done it myself.
You explained your mistakes well but your apology did come off a little self-indulgent and emotionally needy. Still, whatever. Nobody’s perfect. Enough with the disproportionate, self-indulgent apologies. I think some here have been way over the line saying that they hope you get sued. That’s an awful thing to wish on someone and they should rethink being so mean-spirited.
Learn from your mistakes and move on. There are plenty of good resources out there for understanding the law as it pertains to your endeavor. The weird thing is that I just so happen to be reading “Mass Media Law” by UW Professor Don R. Pember. I don’t want my message flagged for posting a URL so just Google “Media Law Resource Center” and it will take you right there.
Enough with the disproportionate, self-indulgent apologies. Many others said much more inflammatory things and they aren’t apologies. You provide an absolutely indispensable service to the community. Keep up the (mostly) good work!
Thank you for the apology, such as it is. I will say that it much of it rings a bit hollow to me–especially the part where you say that you included “a note pleading with people NOT to take their anger out on the company.” The title “Trumpland Comes to Wallingford” belies any assertion that you didn’t intend to steer the readers towards a preconceived conclusion towards the man and his company.
The young man in involved in the altercation just pleaded guilty to assault in this case. Turns out that you almost ruined the life of an innocent man based on what a teenager told his mom to stay out of trouble. The electrician with Artisan was suspended without pay for several weeks because of your careless blogging. I really wish that you, Jordan, realize what could have happened to this man who tried to intervene when he saw someone being harassed and was a victim of a false narrative.
Luckily the truth has come out and the innocent man who tried to help another has been cleared in all of this.
But you, Jordan, are guilty of sensationalizing a false narrative and personally injuring an innocent family just to further your political agenda following the elections.
Shame.